chore: sync spec-orchestrator from rust-template by zircote · Pull Request #90 · zircote/nsip

zircote · 2026-02-22T04:13:03Z

Summary

Syncs .claude/commands/spec-orchestrator.md from rust-template upstream
Adds jq-based synthesis guidance to Phase 2 for context-efficient inventory processing

Test plan

Verify spec-orchestrator command loads correctly

- Add team coordination tools to all agents - Update spec-orchestrator command with lifecycle fixes

github-actions · 2026-02-22T04:13:33Z

Benchmark Results

No benchmarks configured. Add benchmarks to benches/ directory.

Full results available in CI artifacts.

github-actions · 2026-02-22T04:14:25Z

Benchmark Results

No benchmarks configured. Add benchmarks to benches/ directory.

Full results available in CI artifacts.

codecov · 2026-02-22T04:15:22Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.83%. Comparing base (bb2f81c) to head (7003351).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #90   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.83%   95.83%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines        6499     6499           
=======================================
  Hits         6228     6228           
  Misses        271      271

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

github-actions · 2026-02-22T04:16:20Z

Code Coverage Report

Overall Coverage: 0%

Summary

Filename                      Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
client.rs                        1444                67    95.36%         118                13    88.98%         923                35    96.21%           0                 0         -
format.rs                        2172                 3    99.86%         132                 1    99.24%        1292                 1    99.92%           0                 0         -
main.rs                           326               241    26.07%          14                 8    42.86%         225               168    25.33%           0                 0         -
mcp/analytics.rs                  408                 2    99.51%          24                 0   100.00%         331                 0   100.00%           0                 0         -
mcp/mod.rs                        144                55    61.81%          23                15    34.78%         128                65    49.22%           0                 0         -
mcp/prompts.rs                   1908                33    98.27%         126                 6    95.24%        1043                12    98.85%           0                 0         -
mcp/resources.rs                 1317                20    98.48%          93                 1    98.92%         865                 6    99.31%           0                 0         -
mcp/tools.rs                     2146                90    95.81%         116                18    84.48%        1333                47    96.47%           0                 0         -
models.rs                        1079                31    97.13%          78                10    87.18%         762                14    98.16%           0                 0         -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                           10944               542    95.05%         724                72    90.06%        6902               348    94.96%           0                 0         -

Full HTML report available in CI artifacts.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Syncs the upstream “spec-orchestrator” Claude command into this repo to enable parallelized spec discovery → plan synthesis → wave-based implementation, and updates local agent tool permissions to better support task/team workflows.

Changes:

Added .claude/commands/spec-orchestrator.md command (includes jq-based inventory synthesis guidance in Phase 2).
Expanded tool access in .claude/agents/* to include task/team messaging and task lifecycle tools.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
.claude/commands/spec-orchestrator.md	New spec orchestration procedure, including jq-based merging/summarization workflow.
.claude/agents/test-engineer.md	Updates description formatting; expands tools to include Task*/SendMessage/LSP.
.claude/agents/rust-developer.md	Updates description formatting; expands tools to include Task*/SendMessage.
.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md	Updates description formatting; expands tools to include editing + Task lifecycle tools.

Copilot · 2026-02-22T04:17:26Z

.claude/commands/spec-orchestrator.md

+jq '[.enums[] | {phase: "A", subject: "Define \(.name) enum", spec_file: .spec_file, existing: .existing_impl}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json
+
+# Phase B candidates: one task per model
+jq '[.models[] | {phase: "B", subject: "Implement \(.name) model", fields: [.fields[].name], spec_file: .spec_file, existing: .existing_impl}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json
+
+# Phase C candidates: repository/data layer per model
+jq '[.models[] | {phase: "C", subject: "Implement \(.name) repository and queries", spec_file: .spec_file, relationships: .relationships}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json
+
+# Phase D candidates: one task per endpoint
+jq '[.endpoints[] | {phase: "D", subject: "\(.method) \(.path)", status_codes: .status_codes, error_cases: .error_cases, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json
+
+# Phase E candidates: business logic and cross-entity workflows
+jq '[.business_logic[] | {phase: "E", subject: "Implement: \(.description)", affected_entities: .affected_entities, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json
+
+# Phase F candidates: auth, middleware, cross-cutting concerns
+jq '[.cross_cutting[] | {phase: "F", subject: "Implement \(.concern)", details: .details, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json
+
+# Phase G candidates: integration tests per endpoint
+jq '[.endpoints[] | {phase: "G", subject: "Integration tests for \(.method) \(.path)", error_cases: .error_cases, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json


The Step 4 jq task-candidate examples will error if the arrays/fields are missing or empty (e.g., .models[] when models is absent, or .fields[].name when fields is null). To make the guidance robust, use (.models // [])[] / (.enums // [])[] and extract field names via something like (.fields // [] | map(.name)).

Suggested change

jq '[.enums[] | {phase: "A", subject: "Define \(.name) enum", spec_file: .spec_file, existing: .existing_impl}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase B candidates: one task per model

jq '[.models[] | {phase: "B", subject: "Implement \(.name) model", fields: [.fields[].name], spec_file: .spec_file, existing: .existing_impl}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase C candidates: repository/data layer per model

jq '[.models[] | {phase: "C", subject: "Implement \(.name) repository and queries", spec_file: .spec_file, relationships: .relationships}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase D candidates: one task per endpoint

jq '[.endpoints[] | {phase: "D", subject: "\(.method) \(.path)", status_codes: .status_codes, error_cases: .error_cases, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase E candidates: business logic and cross-entity workflows

jq '[.business_logic[] | {phase: "E", subject: "Implement: \(.description)", affected_entities: .affected_entities, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase F candidates: auth, middleware, cross-cutting concerns

jq '[.cross_cutting[] | {phase: "F", subject: "Implement \(.concern)", details: .details, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase G candidates: integration tests per endpoint

jq '[.endpoints[] | {phase: "G", subject: "Integration tests for \(.method) \(.path)", error_cases: .error_cases, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

jq '[(.enums // [])[] | {phase: "A", subject: "Define \(.name) enum", spec_file: .spec_file, existing: .existing_impl}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase B candidates: one task per model

jq '[(.models // [])[] | {phase: "B", subject: "Implement \(.name) model", fields: (.fields // [] | map(.name)), spec_file: .spec_file, existing: .existing_impl}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase C candidates: repository/data layer per model

jq '[(.models // [])[] | {phase: "C", subject: "Implement \(.name) repository and queries", spec_file: .spec_file, relationships: .relationships}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase D candidates: one task per endpoint

jq '[(.endpoints // [])[] | {phase: "D", subject: "\(.method) \(.path)", status_codes: .status_codes, error_cases: .error_cases, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase E candidates: business logic and cross-entity workflows

jq '[(.business_logic // [])[] | {phase: "E", subject: "Implement: \(.description)", affected_entities: .affected_entities, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase F candidates: auth, middleware, cross-cutting concerns

jq '[(.cross_cutting // [])[] | {phase: "F", subject: "Implement \(.concern)", details: .details, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

# Phase G candidates: integration tests for each endpoint

jq '[(.endpoints // [])[] | {phase: "G", subject: "Integration tests for \(.method) \(.path)", error_cases: .error_cases, spec_file: .spec_file}]' /tmp/discovery/merged.json

Copilot · 2026-02-22T04:17:26Z

.claude/commands/spec-orchestrator.md

+
+### 1.4 Collect & Validate Discovery
+
+After all discovery `Task` subagents return their results, use `Glob` pattern `/tmp/discovery/*.json` to verify all inventory files exist. Read only the inventory JSON files — do NOT re-read the original spec files.


Phase 1.4 instructs to "Read only the inventory JSON files", but Phase 2 later says to NEVER read /tmp/discovery/*.json directly with Read and to use jq instead. This is internally inconsistent and could cause context overflow if followed literally. Consider updating Phase 1.4 to also use jq (or at least Read with a small limit) and keep the guidance consistent across phases.

Suggested change

After all discovery `Task` subagents return their results, use `Glob` pattern `/tmp/discovery/*.json` to verify all inventory files exist. Read only the inventory JSON files — do NOT re-read the original spec files.

After all discovery `Task` subagents return their results, use `Glob` pattern `/tmp/discovery/*.json` to verify all inventory files exist. When consuming inventories, do NOT `Read` these JSON files directly in full; instead, use `jq` to extract only the specific fields or records you need from `/tmp/discovery/*.json` (or, if absolutely necessary, use `Read` with a small `limit` on the `jq`-reduced output). Do NOT re-read the original spec files.

Copilot · 2026-02-22T04:17:27Z

.claude/commands/spec-orchestrator.md

+  total_endpoints: [.[].endpoints // [] | length] | add,
+  total_models: [.[].models // [] | length] | add,
+  total_enums: [.[].enums // [] | length] | add,
+  total_validation_rules: [.[].validation_rules // [] | length] | add,
+  total_business_logic: [.[].business_logic // [] | length] | add,
+  total_gaps: [.[].gaps // [] | length] | add,


Copilot · 2026-02-22T04:17:27Z

.claude/commands/spec-orchestrator.md

+Wave 2: Phase B tasks (blocked by Phase A)
+Wave 3: Phase C tasks (blocked by Phase B)
+...
+```
+


The git add {files_modified} and git commit -m "feat({domain}): {concise description} ..." commands interpolate file paths and other values directly into shell commands without any quoting or escaping, which can enable command injection via crafted filenames or description text containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(...) or backticks). An attacker who introduces maliciously named files or spec-derived strings could cause arbitrary commands to execute when these Bash snippets run as written. To mitigate this, ensure file paths and dynamic text are passed to git without going through the shell (or are rigorously shell-escaped/quoted, e.g., using git add -- with safely constructed argument lists and commit messages that avoid unescaped interpolation).

…rompt

github-actions · 2026-02-22T04:19:49Z

Benchmark Results

No benchmarks configured. Add benchmarks to benches/ directory.

Full results available in CI artifacts.

github-actions · 2026-02-22T04:21:33Z

Code Coverage Report

Overall Coverage: 0%

Summary

Filename                      Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
client.rs                        1444                67    95.36%         118                13    88.98%         923                35    96.21%           0                 0         -
format.rs                        2172                 3    99.86%         132                 1    99.24%        1292                 1    99.92%           0                 0         -
main.rs                           326               241    26.07%          14                 8    42.86%         225               168    25.33%           0                 0         -
mcp/analytics.rs                  408                 2    99.51%          24                 0   100.00%         331                 0   100.00%           0                 0         -
mcp/mod.rs                        144                55    61.81%          23                15    34.78%         128                65    49.22%           0                 0         -
mcp/prompts.rs                   1908                33    98.27%         126                 6    95.24%        1043                12    98.85%           0                 0         -
mcp/resources.rs                 1317                20    98.48%          93                 1    98.92%         865                 6    99.31%           0                 0         -
mcp/tools.rs                     2146                90    95.81%         116                18    84.48%        1333                47    96.47%           0                 0         -
models.rs                        1079                31    97.13%          78                10    87.18%         762                14    98.16%           0                 0         -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                           10944               542    95.05%         724                72    90.06%        6902               348    94.96%           0                 0         -

Full HTML report available in CI artifacts.

github-actions · 2026-02-22T04:36:57Z

Benchmark Results

No benchmarks configured. Add benchmarks to benches/ directory.

Full results available in CI artifacts.

github-actions · 2026-02-22T04:39:02Z

Code Coverage Report

Overall Coverage: 0%

Summary

Filename                      Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
client.rs                        1444                67    95.36%         118                13    88.98%         923                35    96.21%           0                 0         -
format.rs                        2172                 3    99.86%         132                 1    99.24%        1292                 1    99.92%           0                 0         -
main.rs                           326               241    26.07%          14                 8    42.86%         225               168    25.33%           0                 0         -
mcp/analytics.rs                  408                 2    99.51%          24                 0   100.00%         331                 0   100.00%           0                 0         -
mcp/mod.rs                        144                55    61.81%          23                15    34.78%         128                65    49.22%           0                 0         -
mcp/prompts.rs                   1908                33    98.27%         126                 6    95.24%        1043                12    98.85%           0                 0         -
mcp/resources.rs                 1317                20    98.48%          93                 1    98.92%         865                 6    99.31%           0                 0         -
mcp/tools.rs                     2146                90    95.81%         116                18    84.48%        1333                47    96.47%           0                 0         -
models.rs                        1079                31    97.13%          78                10    87.18%         762                14    98.16%           0                 0         -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                           10944               542    95.05%         724                72    90.06%        6902               348    94.96%           0                 0         -

Full HTML report available in CI artifacts.

github-actions · 2026-02-22T06:00:53Z

Benchmark Results

No benchmarks configured. Add benchmarks to benches/ directory.

Full results available in CI artifacts.

github-actions · 2026-02-22T06:02:59Z

Code Coverage Report

Overall Coverage: 0%

Summary

Filename                      Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
client.rs                        1444                67    95.36%         118                13    88.98%         923                35    96.21%           0                 0         -
format.rs                        2172                 3    99.86%         132                 1    99.24%        1292                 1    99.92%           0                 0         -
main.rs                           326               241    26.07%          14                 8    42.86%         225               168    25.33%           0                 0         -
mcp/analytics.rs                  408                 2    99.51%          24                 0   100.00%         331                 0   100.00%           0                 0         -
mcp/mod.rs                        144                55    61.81%          23                15    34.78%         128                65    49.22%           0                 0         -
mcp/prompts.rs                   1908                33    98.27%         126                 6    95.24%        1043                12    98.85%           0                 0         -
mcp/resources.rs                 1317                20    98.48%          93                 1    98.92%         865                 6    99.31%           0                 0         -
mcp/tools.rs                     2146                90    95.81%         116                18    84.48%        1333                47    96.47%           0                 0         -
models.rs                        1079                31    97.13%          78                10    87.18%         762                14    98.16%           0                 0         -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                           10944               542    95.05%         724                72    90.06%        6902               348    94.96%           0                 0         -

Full HTML report available in CI artifacts.

zircote added 2 commits February 21, 2026 22:39

perf(.claude): sync agents and spec-orchestrator from rust-template

758b76b

- Add team coordination tools to all agents - Update spec-orchestrator command with lifecycle fixes

chore: sync spec-orchestrator from rust-template

a4d5ee0

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 22, 2026 04:13

zircote had a problem deploying to copilot February 22, 2026 04:13 — with GitHub Actions Error

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of zircote February 22, 2026 04:13 View session

fix(.claude): add missing Phase C/E/F/G/H jq candidates

6165cbf

zircote temporarily deployed to copilot February 22, 2026 04:14 — with GitHub Actions Inactive

Copilot AI reviewed Feb 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

feat(.claude): add jq discovery context to task format and teammate p…

9cfb21b

…rompt

zircote temporarily deployed to copilot February 22, 2026 04:19 — with GitHub Actions Inactive

feat(.claude): use mnemonic blackboard for orchestrator work directory

1a095b7

zircote temporarily deployed to copilot February 22, 2026 04:36 — with GitHub Actions Inactive

fix(.claude): ensure all teammates receive identical full prompts

7003351

zircote temporarily deployed to copilot February 22, 2026 06:00 — with GitHub Actions Inactive

zircote closed this Feb 22, 2026


		### 1.4 Collect & Validate Discovery

		After all discovery `Task` subagents return their results, use `Glob` pattern `/tmp/discovery/*.json` to verify all inventory files exist. Read only the inventory JSON files — do NOT re-read the original spec files.

Conversation

zircote commented Feb 22, 2026

Summary

Test plan

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Benchmark Results

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Benchmark Results

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Code Coverage Report

Summary

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 22, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 22, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 22, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 22, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Benchmark Results

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Code Coverage Report

Summary

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Benchmark Results

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Code Coverage Report

Summary

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Benchmark Results

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 22, 2026

Code Coverage Report

Summary

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading